Appeal No. 2001-2043
Application No. 09/044,629
of exemplary claims 9 and 15 which claims can be found in
Paper No. 23.
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Jackson 3,191,791 Jun. 29, 1965
Boardman 5,492,223 Feb. 20, 1996
Shcherbin et al SU 1,537,459 Jan. 23, 1990
(Shcherbin)(Soviet Union)
The following rejections are before us for review.
Claims 9 through 11, 13, and 14 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Boardman.
Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Boardman in view of Jackson.
Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Boardman in view of the Soviet Union
reference.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007