Ex Parte FREITAG et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-2176                                                        
          Application 09/031,186                                                      

                                   THE INVENTION                                      
               The invention relates to a sealing ring which is defined in            
          representative claim 1 as follows:                                          
               1.  A sealing ring comprising:                                         
               a toroidal supporting body having a longitudinal axis, and a           
          sloped, radially outer portion set at an angle with respect to              
          the axis, the sloped portion of the supporting body being bound             
          by two axially offset planes which define the axial extent of the           
          slope,                                                                      
               a sealing body comprising a dynamically stressed sealing lip           
          made of an elastomeric material which at least partially encloses           
          the supporting body, the sealing body having a sloped surface               
          facing the sealing lip, and the sealing body having a dynamically           
          stressed sealing bulge on the side of the sealing lip facing away           
          from a space to be sealed, said sealing bulge coming in tight               
          contact with the surface to be sealed under an initial elastic              
          stress, wherein the sealing bulge is arranged between the two               
          radial planes in the axial direction which border the slope                 
          axially                                                                     
               wherein the sloped portion is in contact with the sealing              
          body and the portion which contacts the sealing body faces toward           
          the longitudinal axis of the toroidal supporting body.                      
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1, 6 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as           
          being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 4,298,203 to Holzer et al.             
          (Holzer).                                                                   
               Claims 2, 5, 7, 8, 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.            
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Holzer.                                 
               Attention is directed to the appellants’ brief (Paper No.              
          13) and to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 14) for the                     


                                          2                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007