Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte GRAZIOLI - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2001 > Ex parte GRAZIOLI - Page 1

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 20              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte VITTORIO GRAZIOLI                               
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2001-2294                                  
                               Application 29/097,935                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                              HEARD: November 13, 2001                                
                                     ___________                                      

          Before GARRIS, FRANKFORT, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of the following design claim:                                    
          The ornamental design for a chair as shown and described.                   


          As noted in appellant's brief (page 2), the invention is                    
          a chair as shown and described, particularly with reference to              
          Figures 1 through 5 of the originally filed “drawings,” i.e.,               
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007