The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ALBRECHT DEMMIG,
HANS-ULRICH DIETZE,
HUBERTUS H3HNE,
and
SEBASTIAN BENENOWSKI
_____________
Appeal No. 2001-2378
Application No. 09/479,932
______________
HEARD: NOVEMBER 13, 2001
_______________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1-4, 6-12 and 14-17. Claim 13 has been canceled
(see Paper No. 8). Dependent claims 5 and 18, the only other
claims currently pending in the application, have been
objected to by the examiner (see Paper No. 9) and apparently
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007