Appeal No. 2001-2566 Page 7
Application No. 09/655,092
the examiner’s obviousness rejection of claims 1 and 12 or
claims 2-8, 10 and 11 which depend from claim 1.
The above-noted deficiency in the combination of Getsay
and Miller finds no cure in Richter. Thus, we also shall not
sustain the examiner’s obviousness rejection of claim 9.
(...continued)2
(CCPA 1970)).
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007