PACHOLOK V. HUTMACHER et al. - Page 16



               Interference No. 103,830                                                                                              


               way by either of my colleagues.  As a result, I express no opinion on the merits of that                              
               interpretation.                                                                                                       



                                       JOHN C. MARTIN                                 ) BOARD OF PATENT                              
                                       Administrative Patent Judge                    )     APPEALS AND                              
                                                                                      )   INTERFERENCES                              
               JCM:clm                                                                                                               































                                                           - 16 -                                                                    



Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007