Claims of the parties
9. The claims of the parties are:
Chang: 1-7
Winer: 1 and 6-25
10. The claims of the parties which correspond to the
count, and therefore are involved in the interference (35 U.S.C.
§ 135(a)), are:
Chang: 1-7
Winer: 1 and 6-25
11. The claims of the parties which do not correspond
to the count are:
Chang: None
Winer: None
Briefs and record
12. Chang has submitted (1) record and (2) a principal
brief on the issue of priority.
13. Winer did not submit a record or a brief opposing
Chang's principal brief.
14. The Chang record includes an AFFIDAVIT OF WEN-LUNG
CHANG (hereinafter "Affidavit"), signed (1) on 13 October 2000 by
Wen-Lung Chang and (2) on 23 October 2000 by his patent attorney,
David E. Newhouse, Esq. (hereinafter "Newhouse").
15. The fact that Winer did not file a brief opposing
Chang's principal brief is not an admission per se that Chang is
entitled to prevail on priority. Rather, we consider Chang's
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007