The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HENRI E. BODDE, JOHANNA A. BOUWSTRA,
MARIA H. PONEC, FERDINAND SPIES,
KLAUS SANDROCK, and
JOHANNES BRUSSEE
__________
Appeal No. 1995-1303
Application 08/004,603
__________
HEARD: March 22, 2001
__________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SCHEINER, and GRIMES Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims
1 through 7, all the claims in the application. Claim 1 is representative of the subject
matter on appeal and reads as follows:
1. 1-Oleyl-azacycloheptan-2-one.
The references relied upon by the examiner are:
Minaskanian et al 4,920,101 April 1990
Rajadhyaksha 4,415,563 November 1983
Francoeur et al 4,959,365 September 1990
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007