Ex parte VOORDOUW et al. - Page 3


                     Appeal No. 1995-3965                                                                                                         
                     Application No. 07/719,005                                                                                                   

                     Wang et al. (Wang), “Simultaneous Detection of Both DHBV DNA and DHBV DNA                                                    
                     Polymerase by Reverse Spot Hybridization,” Chinese J. Microbiol. Immunol., Vol. 9,                                           
                     No. 4, pp. 261-264 (1989).  BIOSIS Abstract only.                                                                            
                                                      GROUNDS OF REJECTION1                                                                       

                              Claims 1, 3-5 and 7-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                
                     unpatentable over Wang in view of Hitzman and further in view of Kimmel.                                                     
                              We reverse.                                                                                                         
                                                                DISCUSSION                                                                        
                              In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered appellants’                                                  
                     specification and claims, in addition to the respective positions articulated by the                                         
                     appellants and the examiner.  We make reference to the examiner’s Answer2, and                                               
                     the examiner’s Supplemental Answer3 for the examiner’s reasoning in support of the                                           
                     rejections.  We further reference appellants’ Brief4, and appellants’ Reply Brief5 for                                       

                     the appellants’ arguments in favor of patentability.                                                                         
                     THE REJECTION UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 103:                                                                                         
                              Initially, we note that this appeal was remanded to the examiner, at the                                            
                     request of the Office of the Group Director of Technology Center 1600, on April 15,                                          
                     1998.  See Paper No. 32½.  However, after reconsideration of the issues on                                                   
                     appeal, the examiner returned the application to the Board, where it was returned                                            
                                                                                                                                                  
                     1 We note the examiner withdrew (Supplemental Answer, page 1) the rejection of                                               
                     claims 1, 7, 8, 9 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being unpatentable over the                                               
                     abstract of Wang in view of appellants’ amendment received October 7, 1994                                                   
                     (Paper No. 28).                                                                                                              
                     2 Paper No. 27, mailed August 9, 1994.                                                                                       
                     3 Paper No. 30, mailed November 14, 1994.                                                                                    
                     4 Paper No. 26, received May 31, 1994.                                                                                       

                                                                        3                                                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007