Ex Parte INUSHIMA et al - Page 18



          Appeal No. 1996-3262                                                        
          Application No. 08/141,632                                                  

          et al or Nakahata et al when taken with Cole or Olmstead, or                
          Miura et al.30                                                              
               As regards the Kimoto et al patent, Appellants repeat31                
          their arguments presented in Section A above, that Kimoto et al             
          shows a diamond semiconductor diode and does not teach any fluid            
          sensing function or that the diamond layer should contact the               
          fluid.  In addition, Appellants assert that a teaching relating             
          to a diode does not inherently motivate use of such a diode as a            
          fluid sensor device with the diamond film exposed to the fluid.             
               With respect to the Nakahata et al reference, Appellants               
          repeat32 their argument that Nakahata et al relates to a                    
          thermistor as a temperature sensor and compensator for an                   
          electric circuit and not a fluid flow sensor and makes no mention           
          of sensing a fluid.  In addition, Appellants again argue that               
          Nakahata et al teaches33 away from his diamond film being in                
          contact with a fluid to be sensed by suggesting that a protective           
          film be provided to cover exposed parts of the diamond film.                
               30                                                                     
               30 The Aslam patent was withdrawn as a reference in the                
          Supplemental Examiner's Answer mailed December 26, 1996.                    
               31                                                                     
               31 Supplemental Reply Brief, page 2                                    
               32                                                                     
               32 See Section B above                                                 
               33                                                                     
               33 Column 2, lines 45-49                                               
                                          18                                          




Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007