Ex parte DIEDRICH et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1996-3273                                                        
          Application 08/127,932                                                      


          the invention transfers data to a transmission queue within                 
          the sending station based on both the availability of the                   
          transmission queue and on multimedia pacing requests.                       
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  A method in a distributed data processing system for               
          the interchange of multimedia data and non-multimedia data                  
          between a plurality of receiving stations and a sending                     
          station, wherein said sending station contains a transmission               
          queue, said method comprising the steps of:                                 
               transmitting a multimedia pacing request from one of said              
          plurality of receiving stations to said sending station at                  
          selected time intervals,                                                    
               periodically determining an availability of said                       
          transmission queue within said sending station, and                         
               selectively transferring said multimedia data and said                 
          non-multimedia data to said transmission queue in a selected                
          order in response to both said determined availability of said              
          transmission queue and said multimedia pacing requests,                     
          wherein said method increases the overall information flow                  
          through said transmission queue.                                            
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Blasbalg                    4,771,391          Sep. 13, 1988                
          The admitted prior art set forth in appellants’ specification.              
          Claims 1-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                       
          being anticipated by the disclosure of Blasbalg.  Claims 1-6                
          also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                          



                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007