The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MICHAEL C. HOLLATZ,
DAN M. RIGHI,
JOSEPH C. STEINLICHT,
and
KURT E. SUNDERMAN
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0805
Application No. 08/314,189
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO, and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1-22, which are all of the claims pending in the
present application.
The claimed invention relates to automatic telephone call
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007