Ex parte KARNEZOS et al. - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 25         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                        Ex parte MARCOS KARNEZOS, S.C. CHANG,                         
                          EDWARD G. COMBS, and JOHN R. FAHEY                          
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1997-3152                                 
                              Application No. 08/116,305                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before MARTIN, DIXON, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                
          the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-19, which are all                
          of the claims pending in this application.                                  
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants invention relates to a plastic molded                   
          package with a heat sink.  An understanding of the invention                
          can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is                
          reproduced as follows:                                                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007