The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAMODAR M. PAI and JOHN F. YANUS
____________
Appeal No. 1997-3646
Application No. 08/172,521
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 15-17 and 19-29, as amended after final
rejection. Claim 30, the only other claim pending in this
application, has been indicated as allowable by the examiner.1
BACKGROUND
See page 2 of the supplemental examiner’s answer.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007