The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MASATO TANIGUCHI,
KIYOSHI MORIMOTO,
HIROSHI FUJIMOTO,
and
AKIMITSU HAIJIMA
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-3787
Application No. 08/275,241
______________
HEARD: FEBRUARY 6, 2001
_______________
Before PAK, LIEBERMAN, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 9,
which are all of the claims pending in the above-identified
application. See the resubmitted Brief dated April 15, 1996
(Paper No. 18, hereinafter referred to as “Brief”), page 2.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007