Ex parte SCHUURMAN et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1998-0787                                                        
          Application No. 08/491,769                                                  


          Frank D. Gunstone et al. (Gunstone), Lipids in Foods                        
          Chemistry, Biochemistry and Technology 147-55 (Pergamon Press,              
          New York 1983)                                                              
               The allowed claims in the present application are                      
          directed to a process for preparing a fat continuous spread                 
          which shortens residence time and increases crystallization                 
          rate wherein the beta prime crystals are recirculated into the              
          partially crystallized cool emulsion which is in the alpha                  
          phase.  Claim 14 on appeal is directed to the fat continuous                
          spread produced by the process defined by allowed claim 12.                 
          According to appellants, the claimed spread has good spreading              
          and organoleptic characteristics and "contains a relatively                 
          high proportion of unsaturated fatty acids, but a relatively                
          low proportion of trans fatty acid" (page 7 of Brief).                      
               Appealed claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as being unpatentable over Wheeler in view of Havenstein and                
          Gunstone.                                                                   
               We have thoroughly reviewed each of appellants' arguments              
          for patentability, as well as the specification data relied                 
          upon in support thereof.  However, we find that the examiner's              
          rejection is free of reversible error.                                      
               Based on appellants' specification and the arguments                   
          presented in appellants' Brief, the principal distinction                   
                                         -4-                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007