The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DAVID B. CHANEY, BARRY W. SMITH and THOMAS H. MILLS
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0863
Application 08/502,831
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to
20, all the claims in the application. In the supplemental
examiner’s answer (Paper No. 16) the examiner states that
claims 1 to 10 are allowed, leaving claims 11 to 20 before us
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007