Ex parte CHEN - Page 4




                     Appeal No. 1998-0875                                                                                                                                              
                     Application No. 08/210,529                                                                                                                                        



                     Ejiri      1                                          62-274962                                                       Nov. 28,                                    
                     1987                                                                                                                                                              
                     (Published Japanese Kokai Patent Application)                                                                                                                     
                     Welsh                                                 WO 94/00951                                           Jan.  6, 1994                                         
                     (Published PCT International Patent Application)                                                                                                                  
                                Claims 1, 3 through 11, 13 through 16, 19 and 24 through                                                                                               
                     26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                                                                                               
                     unpatentable over Welsh and Ejiri.                                                                                                                                
                                Reference is made to the brief (paper number 13) and the                                                                                               
                     answer (paper number 14) for the respective positions of the                                                                                                      
                     appellant and the examiner.                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                   OPINION                                                                                             
                                The obviousness rejection of claims 1, 3 through 11, 13                                                                                                
                     through 16, 19 and 24 through 26 is reversed.                                                                                                                     
                                Welsh recognizes that a 10 frame/second transmission rate                                                                                              
                     of an image transmitter (Figure 1) leads to a loss of                                                                                                             
                     synchronization between a speaker’s lips and the transmitted                                                                                                      
                     speech (page 2).  By extracting and encoding lip movement via                                                                                                     
                     feature extractor 106 and encoder 110, respectively, at a                                                                                                         
                     higher frame/second rate than the remainder of the image                                                                                                          
                     encoded by encoder 102, the speaker’s lips can be placed in                                                                                                       

                                1A copy of the translation for this reference is attached.                                                                                             
                                                                                          4                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007