Ex parte NICHOLS et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-0905                                                        
          Application 08/284,061                                                      


               a subsystem comprising a host central processing unit                  
          (CPU) operating in accordance with at least one application                 
          program and a device handler program, said subsystem further                
          comprising an adapter subsystem interoperating with said host               
          CPU and said device;                                                        
               a realtime signal processing subsystem for performing a                
          plurality of data transforms comprising a plurality of                      
          realtime signal processing operations; and                                  
               at least one realtime application program interface (API)              
          coupled between the subsystem and the realtime signal                       
          processing subsystem to allow the subsystem to interoperate                 
          with said realtime services.                                                
               Examiner relies on the following references:                           
          Chen et al. (Chen)            5,440,740           Aug.  8, 1995             
          Elnkauf                       EP 0218859     Apr. 22, 1989                  
          (European Patent)                                                           
          Tanenbaum, Structured Computer Organization, pp. 10-12, 1984                
          Silberschatz et al. (Silberschatz), Operating System Concepts,              
          pg. 489, 1994                                                               


               Claims 1 through 15 and 17 through 42 are rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Chen.2                           
               Rather than reiterate all arguments of Appellants and                  


               2 The Examiner’s answer initially included Elnkauf as the              
          basis for a new ground of rejection.  However, this rejection               
          was withdrawn in the supplemental answer mailed August 20,                  
          1997.                                                                       
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007