Appeal No. 1998-0942
Application No. 08/324,038
Eggleden WO/86/06238 Oct. 23, 1986
Claims 1-8, 10-22, 24-26 and 28 stand provisionally
rejected under obviousness-type double patenting as being
obvious over claims 16-33 of Application Serial No. 08/231,570
over claims 1-12 and 14-18 in view of Nishizawa and Sniff.
Claims 9, 23 and 27 stand provisionally rejected under
obviousness-type double patenting over claims 16, 17, 21, 24,
31 and 32 of Application Serial No. 08/231,570 in view of
Nishizawa, Sniff and Honma.
Claims 1-5, 7, 10-12 and 15-19 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Eggleden in view of
Villa-Real, Brennan, Nishizawa and Sniff.
Claims 6, 8, 14, 20-22, 24-26 and 28 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Eggleden in view of
Villa-Real, Brennan, Nishizawa, Sniff and Tanielian.
Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Eggleden, Villa-Real, Brennan and Nishizawa
in view of Gaskill.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007