Ex parte IKEBE et al. - Page 2




                   Appeal No.  1998-0998                                                                                                                            
                   Application 08/426,069                                                                                                                           

                            Independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                                                           
                            1.  A cartridge which comprises a case consisting of upper and lower shells joined                                                      
                   and containing a recording medium therein, said case having a slot formed to expose the                                                          
                   recording medium partly, a shutter which rests astride on one edge portion of the case and                                                       
                   is slidable between an open position where the shutter opens the slot and a closed                                                               
                   position where the shutter closes the slot, and a locking member which keeps the shutter in                                                      
                   the closed position, said case having a recess formed in a portion of a peripheral edge of                                                       
                   said case adjacent and external to the shutter, defined by a cutout across the entire                                                            
                   thickness of the case, to receive an unlocking member from a recording-reproducing unit,                                                         
                   said locking member having an exposed portion exposed partly in the recess for access of                                                         
                   the unlocking member, so that when the unlocking member pushes the locking member on                                                             
                   the exposed portion, a hooked head of the locking member is disengaged from an                                                                   
                   engaging projection formed inside an end face of the shutter.                                                                                    
                            The Examiner relies on the following reference:                                                                                         
                   Koyama et al. (Koyama)                                    0,218,231                    Apr. 15, 1987                                             
                   (European Patent Application)                                                                                                                    
                            Claims 1 and 3 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                                  
                   unpatentable over Koyama.                                                                                                                        
                            Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the Examiner, reference is                                                        
                                             1                                                                                                                      
                   made to the Briefs  and Answer for the respective details thereof.                                                                               
                                                                           OPINION                                                                                  

                            We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 7 under 35 U.S.C.                                                           
                   § 103.                                                                                                                                           


                            1Appellants filed an Appeal Brief on April 14, 1997.  Appellants filed a Reply Brief                                                    
                   on September 15, 1997.  The Examiner mailed an office communication on January 22,                                                               
                   1998, stating that the Reply Brief has been entered and considered, but no further                                                               
                   response by the Examiner is deemed necessary.                                                                                                    
                                                                                 2                                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007