Appeal No. 1998-1088 Page 4
Application No. 08/523,809
a screen protection panel disposed adjacent
said lenticular lens system,
wherein said screen protection panel is equipped
with a light-absorbing means for absorbing light
spread by said lenticular lens system, and
further comprising a projecting part formed at a
predetermined height on the side of said screen
protection panel that faces said lenticular lens
system, and wherein said light absorbing means
comprises a darkened stripe formed on said
projecting part.
Besides the appellant‘s admitted prior art (AAPA), the
reference relied on in rejecting the claims follows:
Takuma et al. (Takuma) 5,448,401 Sep. 5,
1995
filed Dec. 21, 1993.
Claims 1 and 3-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
obvious over AAPA in view of Takuma. Rather than repeat the
arguments of the appellant or examiner in toto, we refer the
reader to the briefs and answer for the respective details
thereof.
OPINION
In deciding this appeal, we considered the subject matter
on appeal and the rejection advanced by the examiner.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007