Ex parte VENABLE et al. - Page 20




          Appeal No. 1998-1389                                      Page 20           
          Application No. 08/553232                                                   








                    NEW GROUND OF REJECTION UNDER 37 CFR 1.196(b)                     
               Claim 37 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                     
          paragraph, as indefinite.  Claim 37 includes the language                   
          "wherein said constructing module and said rendering module                 
          are capable of constructing and rendering said representation               
          to maintain its appearance independent of resolution and size               
          of the displayed and printed image."  We find the language to               
          be indefinite because the term "representation" refers to the               
          data that can be rendered as a raster, and a pasteboard having              
          at least one image attribute.  The appearance of the                        
          representation, after the representation has been rendered, is              
          the displayed and printed image.  It appears that appellants                
          may have been referring to the representation of a component                
          image in a component pasteboard, which will maintain its                    
          appearance independent of the resolution and size of the                    
          displayed image.  In any event, claim 37 as drafted is                      
          unclear, and its metes and bounds cannot be readily obtained.               








Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007