The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN L. BECK, JEFFREY F. BOIGENZAHN, DARRELL E.
BRATVOLD, CHARLES A. BROWN, LUKE A. COSSETTE, DALE C. GOEKE,
MICHAEL S. GOOD, DALE E. GOODMAN, RICHARD E. LAGERGREN, GREGORY
A. LYONS,
BRIAN L. RAPPEL, JAMES M. RIGOTTI, DANIEL C. STUCKY,
LYLE R. TUFTY, and HERMAN R. WENDT
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1465
Application No. 08/445,926
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 through 10. Claims 3,
5, 7, 11 through 15, and 26 through 34 have been canceled, and
claims 16 through 25 have been withdrawn from consideration as
being drawn to a nonelected invention.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007