Ex parte HALL et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1998-1568                                                        
          Application No. 08/336,352                                                  


          respective positions.  This review leads us to conclude that                
          the examiner has not established a prima facie case of                      
          obviousness regarding the claimed subject matter for                        
          essentially those reasons set forth at pages 3 and 4 of the                 
          Brief.  We only add that none of the applied prior art                      
          references alone, or in combination, teaches or suggests using              
          a non-oxidizing atmosphere or vacuum to enhance the stability               
          and the shelf life of a strong oxidizing etching solution,                  
          much less the claimed Caro's acid (H SO ).  Jayawant, the best              
                                              2  5                                    
          secondary reference relied upon by the examiner, for example,               
          only teaches introducing SO  into a reactor with a suitable                 
                                     3                                                
          inert gas, such as nitrogen, oxygen, air or their mixtures.                 
          See column 3, lines 39-47 and column 6, lines 5-25.  There is               
          no teaching or suggestion that nitrogen, oxygen, air or                     
          mixtures thereof will enhance the stability and the shelf life              
          of a strong oxidizing etching solution, much less Caro's acid.              
          See Jayawant in its entirety.                                               







                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007