Appeal No. 1998-1668
Application No. 08/469,670
objective evidence of nonobviousness to supplement appellants'
specification disclosure. Accordingly, we agree with the
examiner's legal conclusion that it would have been obvious for
one of ordinary skill in the art to perform the claimed process
of U.S. '200 in the manner recited in claim 26 on appeal.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's
decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connec-tion with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JEFFREY T. SMITH ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
BEVERLY PAWLIKOWSKI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
ECK:clm
Barry Evans
Whitman, Breed, Abbott and Morgan
200 Park Ave.
New York, NY 10166
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007