Appeal No. 1998-1672
Application No. 08/708,163
obviousness found in the applied references with
appellant’s counterveiling evidence of and argument for
nonobviousness, and conclude that the claimed invention
encompassed by appealed claims would have been obvious as a
matter of law under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
PETER F. KRATZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ROMULO H. DELMENDO ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
SLD
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007