The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KUNIO KOJIMA, TAKASHI SETSUDA, TAKUMI TAKAMURA,
KOUICHI KANEKO, and HIDEO KUSAMA
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-1779
Application No. 08/658, 447
_____________
ON BRIEF
_____________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-11 and 16-25, all the claims pending
in the application.
The invention pertains to a cathode ray tube having a multi-layered, nonglare film
formed on the reading surface thereof. Claims 1 and 17, the only independent claims, are
illustrative and read as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007