The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte MARCO SUCCI and CAROLINA SOLCIA
________________
Appeal No. 1998-2002
Application 08/690,016
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before GARRIS, HANLON and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 33-40 and 42-57, all of the
claims pending in the application. The claims on appeal are1
1Claims 41 and 58 were also finally rejected. However,
those claims were canceled in an Amendment under 37 CFR §
1.116(a). Paper No. 22. That amendment was entered by the
examiner. See Paper No. 23 (“Upon the filing of an appeal,
the proposed amendment will be entered.”). Therefore, the
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007