Appeal No. 1998-2093
Application No. 08/303,809
implementing data transfer. We therefore do not sustain the rejection of claim 13, nor
claims 16, 17, and 19, incorporating the limitations of claim 13.
Each of independent claim 1, drawn to a process, and independent claim 7, drawn
to a product, contains language corresponding to that of claim 13 in setting forth ordered
sending and receiving of first, second, and third signals between the provider and
consumer computers in effecting data transfer between the computers, and particular
actions associated with the signals. Since not all the limitations of claim 1, nor all the
limitations of claim 7, are met by Yamaoka, we do not sustain the rejection of those claims,
nor the remainder of the claims on appeal, 4-6, 8, and 12, depending from claim 1 or 7.
CONCLUSION
-7-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007