Ex Parte AWATSU et al - Page 3




               Appeal No. 1998-2174                                                                                                 
               Application No. 07/813,733                                                                                           

                       Claims 1-7 and 9-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                            
               unpatentable over Kawamura, Sato, and Utsumi.                                                                        
                       Claims 8, 14, 15, and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                       
               unpatentable over Kawamura, Sato, Utsumi, and Nakagawa.                                                              
                       Claims 16-23 and 24-42 have been withdrawn from consideration.                                               
                       We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 30) and the Examiner's Answer                                     
               (Paper No. 34) for a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (Paper No.                                
               33) and the Reply Brief (Paper No. 35) for appellants’ position with respect to the claims                           
               which stand rejected.                                                                                                


                                                            OPINION                                                                 
                       Although appellants’ asserted grouping of the claims on appeal is unclear (see                               
               Brief, page 3; Reply Brief, page 1), appellants do not argue any claims separately with                              
               respect to the rejection over Kawamura, Sato, and Utsumi.  We select claim 1 as                                      
               representative of the claims subject to that ground of rejection.  See 37 CFR                                        
               § 1.192(c)(7).                                                                                                       
                       The examiner states the rationale for the section 103 rejection over Kawamura,                               
               Sato, and Utsumi on pages 4 and 5 of the Answer.  The examiner finds that Kawamura                                   
               teaches an ATM which includes a detachable bank note cassette 16 which is used to                                    
               recharge stackers 21 and 22 (see Kawamura, Fig. 3), and also used to receive currency                                
               from the stackers.  Kawamura is also found to teach a “bank note arranging machine”                                  
                                                                -3-                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007