Appeal No. 1998-2217
Application No. 08/644,555
deficiencies of Steiner and Bluhm. See Answer, p. 4 (“it is
well known to employ velocity differential web transfer to
achieve further increases in the bulk as well as the
extensibility of web prior to final drying as evidenced by GB
1,212,473, Klowak or Weldon.”). Therefore, this rejection is
also reversed.
Conclusion
The rejection of claims 1-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Bluhm is reversed. The rejection of
claims 1-21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Steiner in view of Bluhm and GB ‘473, Klowak or Weldon is
reversed.
REVERSED
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007