Ex parte BEESON - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-2462                                                        
          Application No. 08/548,696                                                  


               Regarding the rejection of claim 8 over Ausnit, Larkin,                
          Causley, and Bauman, claim 8 depends from claim 5 and,                      
          therefore, includes all of the limitations of claim 5.  Bauman              
          fails to cure the deficiencies noted above for the rejection                
          of claim 5 over Ausnit, Larkin, and Causley.  Consequently, we              
          cannot sustain the rejection of claim 8.                                    


























                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007