The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HANS O. CEDERBLAD
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2534
Application No. 08/533,366
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s refusal to allow claims 15 through 17 as amended
subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment dated May
27, 1997, Paper No. 6, entered as per the Advisory Action
dated June 5, 1997, Paper No. 7). Claims 15-17 are the only
claims remaining in this application.
According to appellant, the invention is directed to a
method of stretch modifying an extruded net containing
elastomeric strands to produce desired predetermined
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007