The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DARRELL D. PALMER,
A. DAVID ERPELDING,
OSCAR J. RUIZ,
and
SURYA PATTANAIK
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-2585
Application No. 08/643,935
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, HECKER, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of all the pending claims 1, 2, 4 to1
6, 8 to 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21 to 23, 25 to 28, 34, 35, 37, 38
and 40. Claims 29 to 33 are non-elected, and the remaining
1There was an amendment after the final rejection (paper
no. 20) which was entered by the Examiner (paper no. 21).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007