The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JACQUES R. FRESCO, BIN LIU and LYNN C. KLOTZ
__________
Appeal No. 1998-2648
Application 08/473,888
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before ROBINSON, MILLS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
An oral hearing in this case was scheduled for April 24, 2001. Upon
reviewing the case, however, we have determined that an oral hearing will not be
necessary and we render the following decision based on the record.
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 -14.1 Claim 1 is representative and reads as follows:
1 Claims 15-23 are also pending but have been withdrawn from consideration following a
restriction requirement.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007