Ex parte MARTIN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-2907                                                        
          Application No. 08/471,748                                                  


               a semiconductor die having a movable part in a top face                
          of the die; and                                                             
               a cap bonded over the first face so that a void region is              
          defined between the cap and the part, an outer periphery of                 
          the cap surrounding and sealing the part, wherein the cap is                
          made of metal.                                                              
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Greiff et al. (Greiff)   5,216,490                June. 01, 1993            
          Roylance et al., "A Batch-Fabricated Silicon Accelerometer,"                
               IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. ED-26, No. 12              
               (December 1979), pages 1911-17. (Roylance)                             
          Appellants' admitted prior art shown in Figure 1 and discussed              
               on page 6 of the specification.  (AAPA)                                
               Claims 1 through 22 and 24 through 41 stand rejected                   
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over AAPA in view               
          of Roylance and Greiff.                                                     
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 17,              
          mailed February 17, 1998) for the examiner's complete                       
          reasoning in support of the rejection, and to appellants'                   
          Brief (Paper                                                                
          No. 16, filed December 1, 1997) and Reply Brief (Paper No. 18,              
          filed March 23, 1998) for appellants' arguments thereagainst.               
                                       OPINION                                        

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007