Ex parte MARTENSSON et al. - Page 1




                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                         

                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for     
                              publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                                                       Paper No. 30               
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                                  ____________                                                    
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                    
                          Ex parte NILS E.V. MARTENSSON and MICHAEL B. ASHDOWN                                    
                                                  ____________                                                    
                                               Appeal No. 1998-2936                                               
                                            Application No. 08/665,590                                            
                                                  ____________                                                    
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                  ____________                                                    

             Before FLEMING, DIXON, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
             DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  



                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  

                    This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 16-20.             
             Claims 1-15 have been indicated as allowable by the examiner.                                        


                    We AFFIRM.                                                                                    











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007