Appeal No. 1998-2986
Application No. 08/344,390
same phone. The only rationale we can find is in appellants'
specification. Therefore, the examiner has failed to
establish a prima facie case of obviousness. Accordingly, we
cannot sustain the rejection of claim 13. Further, since all
of the remaining claims include limitations similar to the
ones we have found lacking from the combination of Cooper and
Teare, we likewise cannot sustain the rejection of claims 1
through 12 and 14 through 20.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007