Ex parte CARSON et al. - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1998-2988                                                        
          Application No. 08/502,560                                                  


               a transfer tool having a longitudinal axis;                            
               said mounting fixture including means for fastening an                 
          object to the mounting fixture and means for fastening the                  
          mounting fixture at a remote location;                                      
               said transfer tool including means for mounting and for                
          releasing the mounting fixture to the transfer tool in a                    
          plurality of orientations and moving the mounting fixture to                
          said remote location;                                                       
               said means for mounting and for releasing including a                  
          post extending at an angle to said longitudinal axis and a                  
          flexible means; said post and flexible means connecting said                
          mounting fixture at a location spaced from said longitudinal                
          axis, wherein the object may be moved and released at a                     
          distance spaced from said longitudinal axis.                                
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Montedoro-Whitney, Advertisement for QWIK-STIK (undated)                    
               Claims 1 through 5, 7, and 8 stand rejected under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by, or in the alternative,                   
          under                                                                       
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over QWIK-STIK.                       
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 16,              
          mailed January 7, 1998) for the examiner's complete reasoning               
          in support of the rejection, and to appellants' Brief (Paper                
          No. 15, filed December 12, 1997) for appellants' arguments                  
          thereagainst.                                                               

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007