Ex parte VERMEERSCH et al. - Page 4


                 Appeal No. 1998-3012                                                                                                              
                 Application 08/751,764                                                                                                            

                 partially coalesces the coating, the hydrophilic binder has reactive groups or precursor therefor which                           
                 will cause insolubilization of the layer at elevated temperatures, and the exposed imaging layer can be                           
                 developed with an aqueous medium prior to heating to effect insolubilization (page 2, lines 18-29 and                             
                 39-48).  Gardner would have further disclosed that, inter alia, component A can be hydrophobic                                    
                 thermoplastic polymer particles and component B can be cross-linkable, and if a mixture, the ingredients                          
                 of component B can be “mutually reactive” (page 2, lines 6-12, 30-31, 33 and 37).  The reference                                  
                 discloses examples of polymers for component B which contain carboxylic acid or other groups that                                 
                 confer solubility and which can form a mixture with non-polymeric cross-linking agents (page 3, lines                             
                 20-33) and provides working examples demonstrating such mixtures (Gardner Examples 7 and 18,                                      
                 pages 5 and 6-7).  The exemplified radiation-absorbing substances that cause coalescence of the                                   
                 coating include carbon black (page 3, lines 45-47, and Gardner Examples 7 and 18).  Gardner                                       
                 discloses that the images formed with the imaging element have high durability (e.g., abstract).                                  
                         As further pointed out by the examiner (Paper No. 7, pages 2-3), Vrancken would have                                      
                 disclosed to one of ordinary skill in this art an imaging element comprising a layer of hydrophobic                               
                 thermoplastic polymer particles can be dispersed in a hydrophilic binder that can contain a reactive                              
                 agent that will “harden” the binder, which is on the hydrophilic surface of a lithographic base, wherein                          
                 the transfer of heat from a substance capable of transforming light into heat coalesces the particles in the                      
                 layer, the exposed imaging layer can be developed with an aqueous medium prior and the hydrophilic                                
                 binder can then be “hardened” with heat (e.g., col. 1, lines 19-35, col. 2, lines 17-28, col. 3, line 75, to                      
                 col. 4, line 53, col. 6, lines 7-51, col. 8,        lines 20-38, and col. 11, lines 12-20).  Vrancken would                       
                 have further disclosed that the binder can be, inter alia, gelatin, a polysaccharide, polyvinyl alcohol and                       
                 polyacrylic acid, which can be “hardened for . . . higher mechanical strength,” such as hardening a                               
                 gelatin “by reaction with an aldehyde such as formaldehyde or glyoxal” (col. 4, lines 2-26).  In                                  
                 Vrancken Example 1, an imagining element is used which comprises a layer from two separately applied                              


                                                                                                                                                   
                 2  Since Claims 1, 7 and 8 appear to be substantial duplicates, in the event that these claims are held to                        
                 be allowable, see Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 706.03(k) Duplicate Claims (8th ed.,                                     
                 August 2001; 700-52).                                                                                                             

                                                                      - 4 -                                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007