The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID M. ERDMAN, DALE F. YODER,
RICHARD S. TATMAN, and DAVID T. MOLNAR
____________
Appeal No. 1998-3072
Application No. 08/769,610
____________
HEARD: February 6, 2001
____________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the rejection of claims 1-5, 7-14, 23-25, 33, 34, 75, and 76.
We reverse.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue in this appeal relates to an
integral low power, high efficiency electronically commutated
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007