The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DAVID J. MCGINTY, ERVIN T. POWERS, JR., HYUNKOOK
SHIN,
ROGER K. SIEMIONKO and DAVID M. TAYLOR
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-3094
Application 08/550,968
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 37 and 42-48, which are all of the claims remaining in
the application. In the examiner’s answer, the examiner
indicates claims 43 and 46 to be allowable (page 3). Thus,
the claims before us are claims 37, 42, 44, 45, 47 and 48.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007