Ex parte JAEGER - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-3127                                                        
          Application No. 08/703,418                                                  


               With respect to independent claim 1, the Examiner                      
          proposes to modify the radio frequency tuning indicator                     
          disclosure of Nishimura which, as illustrated in Figure 1,                  
          describes a plurality of user conditionable station selector                
          switch buttons.  As recognized by the Examiner, the selector                
          switch buttons of Nishimura do not include a flat panel                     
          display screen on the front surface of the buttons as claimed.              
          To address this deficiency, the Examiner turns to Leeder which              
          describes a flat panel display screen incorporated in a                     
          programmable function key for displaying a message indicator                
          on the face of the key.  In the Examiner’s line of reasoning                
          as stated at page 4 of the Answer:                                          
                    Thus, it would have been obvious to one having                    
                    ordinary skill in the art at the time the                         
                    invention was made to modify each button of                       
                    Nishimura to have a flat panel display screen                     
                    as taught by Leeder so as to provide a direct                     
                    feedback to the operator indicating that the                      
                    desired key function has been initiated after                     
                    the key is hit, and to reduce the likelihood of                   
                    operator confusion, especially in comparison                      
                    with unlighted keys of the prior art.                             
               In response, Appellant asserts that the Examiner has                   
          failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness since                 
          the proposed combination of Nishimura and Leeder would not                  

                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007