Ex parte RADIA - Page 8




                 Appeal No. 1998-3329                                                                                     Page 8                        
                 Application No. 08/261,518                                                                                                             


                 1955, 1956 (Fed. Cir. 1993)(citing In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d                                                                             
                 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992)).  "’A prima                                                                         
                 facie case of obviousness is established when the teachings                                                                            
                 from the prior art itself would appear to have suggested the                                                                           
                 claimed subject matter to a person of ordinary skill in the                                                                            
                 art.’"  In re Bell, 991 F.2d 781, 782, 26 USPQ2d 1529, 1531                                                                            
                 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting In re Rinehart, 531 F.2d 1048, 1051,                                                                         
                 189 USPQ 143, 147 (CCPA 1976)).                                                                                                        


                          Here, although the column of Radia on which the examiner                                                                      
                 relies mentions that “[p]rogrammers or users are generally                                                                             
                 insulated from dealing with the names of other machines by                                                                             
                 symbolic links,” Radia, p. 74, the examiner fails to show that                                                                         
                 the reference’s symbolic links are themselves linked to                                                                                
                 computers on which execution is to be performed.  To the                                                                               
                 contrary, the appellant, who coauthored the reference,1                                                                                
                 explains that in Radia, “a symbolic link is not itself                                                                                 
                 symbolically linked to a computer, but is manually changed                                                                             
                 from one alphanumeric string to another to specify the                                                                                 

                          1On the copy of Radia in the record, the examiner circled                                                                     
                 the coauthor’s name and noted that he was the “[a]pplicant.”                                                                           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007