Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte REILLY - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2001 > Ex parte REILLY - Page 1

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             

                                                            Paper No. 19              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                               Ex parte PAUL E. REILLY                                
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-0006                                  
                             Application No. 08/470,970                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and LEVY, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection              
          of claims 1-9 and 11-40, which are all of the claims pending                
          in the present application.  Claim 10 has been canceled.  An                
          amendment filed September 23, 1997 after final rejection was                
          approved for entry by the Examiner.                                         
               The claimed invention relates to a centralized print                   
          queue for a network printer system.  Print job requests,                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007