Appeal No. 1999-0154
Application 08/553,201
match/merged with the
billing detail record to produce a call disposition record,
all features present in each of the appealed independent
claims.
We take note of the fact that the Examiner at page 13 of
the Answer attempts to establish equivalence between the
various claimed features and alleged corresponding disclosed
features in Olsen. We can find no basis on the record,
however, for the Examiner’s interpretation of the appealed
claims, nor for the interpretation of the disclosure of Olsen,
expressed in the Answer. The Examiner attempts (Answer, page
14) to show equivalence of the billing information in the TCAP
MSU message in Olsen with that of Appellants by referring to
various passages in Olsen. We find no such disclosure,
however, of any such billing information such as calling
numbers, account information, etc. in these cited passages, or
elsewhere in Olsen. Similarly, we find no disclosure in the
excerpt from Olsen cited by the Examiner (col. 9, lines 49-59)
of the merging of TCAP and ISDN-UP message units, nor any
suggestion that this description could be reasonably
-7-7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007