Ex parte MINAMI - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 21         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                Ex parte YOCHIRO MINAMI                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-0297                                 
                              Application No. 08/502,253                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 HEARD: April 12, 2001                                
                                     ____________                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                
          the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-27, which are all                
          of the claims pending in this application.                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to a selective call                  
          system for reducing power consumption in remote pagers.  An                 
          understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading                
          of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows:                       






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007