The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DUANE E. SHULTZ
__________
Appeal No. 1999-0365
Application 08/601,724
___________
HEARD: May 22, 2001
___________
Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-20, 29, 31, 38-47,
49, 59, 61, 63-68 and 72-77. Claims 23-28, 32-37, 48, 52-58
and 62 have been cancelled. Claims 21, 22, 30, 50, 51, 60 and
69-71 have been indicated to contain allowable subject matter.
The disclosed invention pertains to a transmission
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007