The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte YOUNG-GYO CHOI, BONG-RAE PARK
and ALLEN L. LIMBERG
__________
Appeal No. 1999-0419
Application 08/383,483
__________
HEARD: MAY 9, 2001
__________
Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION BY BOARD
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 5-22, 25, 30, 31 and 36. Claims 3 and 4 have been allowed, and claims 23,
24 and 32-35 have been canceled.
As noted at the top of page 3 of the principal brief on appeal, claims 26-29 have
not been rejected on art in the final rejection. The same is true in the answer. Since
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007